<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>bitcolumns &#187; xp</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bitcolumns.com/tag/xp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bitcolumns.com</link>
	<description>tech news that matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 07:41:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Battle of the OS&#8217;s: Linux Steps up to the Plate</title>
		<link>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2009/07/10/battle-of-the-oss-linux-steps-up-to-the-plate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2009/07/10/battle-of-the-oss-linux-steps-up-to-the-plate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Simmons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitcolumns.com/?p=1610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Introduction to Linux You may or may not know what Linux is. It is an Operating System, the software you use to communicate with the different parts of your computer. Another, very well known OS (Operating System) is Windows, which has many different versions (Windows: XP, Vista and the soon-to-be-released Windows 7). Linux, however, is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div class="Section1">
<h2><span style="font-size: small; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: underline;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Introduction to Linux</span></span></h2>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">You may or may not know what Linux is. It is an Operating System, the software you use to communicate with the different parts of your computer. Another, very well known OS (Operating System) is Windows, which has many different versions (Windows: XP, Vista and the soon-to-be-released Windows 7).</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">Linux, however, is not a commercial product, in the essence that it is not for sale, it is free. It is developed by on-line communities and, in some cases, software developers.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">Windows is produced by Microsoft, by professional software developers, and is available to the user for a fee.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">Linux is Open-Source software, meaning anyone can get the source code (the code that makes up any program) and change it and compile (create) it as they will. Thus it is all free to anyone who desires it, enabling massive flexibility, but also opening it up for compatibility problems as well.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">Microsoft, however, have copyrighted their code for Windows and thus do not release it to the public. Fair enough though, they created it, why should they give it away for free? Also, being a commercial company, this minimises the chance of incompatibility (something Apple have got down to a tee).</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">Apple have a similar principle, as they are also a commercial company, however Apple OSX has been considered a pure version of Unix (an OS Linux was based on). They also do not release their code and make it more difficult for third parties to develop software so as to minimalise (if not entirely route out) the problem of incompatibility, which is the reason why Macs are growing in popularity.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<h2><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="text-decoration: none;">Why Linux? Why Windows? Why Mac OS?</span></span></span></h2>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">The age old question: Which OS do you use? As important to some people as football teams and has created many-a-internet flame war.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">The Apple fan boys, who love Apple and anything said against it gets shot down immediately.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">The Linux fan boys who behave in a similar way, except are usually more knowledgeable with computers and thus think they&#8217;re superior to others.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">And then the people that just use Windows, because it&#8217;s there. Very few fan boys generally exist for Windows.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<h2><span><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-size: small;">Windows</span></span></span></h2>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">You always hear bad press about Windows: Doesn&#8217;t work, viruses, blah blah&#8230;</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">It does work. I&#8217;ll say that straight up. And this is difficult for me to say (*Has been using Linux for 2-3 years and hasn&#8217;t ever looked back*). It just has problems now and then. As I mentioned, people can develop software for it, anyone. You, your brother, sister, father, mother, anyone. So Microsoft have no handle over this. And it&#8217;s up to the user to decide: Is this a good thing to install? If you&#8217;ve paid for it; usually yes, as the company is probably professional; if it&#8217;s free, no, it could&#8217;ve been designed by anyone for any purpose and thus may mess with your computer.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">Microsoft can do nothing about this as it&#8217;s not their stuff that&#8217;s messing up, it&#8217;s someone else&#8217;s.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">Another element: Viruses. You always hear statistics about viruses: Windows has over X amounts of viruses, a new virus out. Windows only gets more viruses because it is more popular. A lot fewer people use Linux or Mac OS than Windows so why bother targeting them? Target the mass market. Though with the growing popularity of the other OS&#8217;s it&#8217;s bringing increasing amounts of new viruses for those OS&#8217;s&#8230;</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">Yes Windows is a bit buggy sometimes but you can&#8217;t entirely blame it alone, it&#8217;s down to a number of factors.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">Why I don&#8217;t use it will come apart when I talk about&#8230;</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<h2><span><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-size: small;">Linux</span></span></span></h2>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">I love Linux. There it is. It&#8217;s great. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I&#8217;m not a fan boy, it&#8217;s buggy as a lone light, mid-summer, coated with moths, but it&#8217;s great. It works. Simple as that. Well, after a little bit of work, and some tweaking. But it works.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">Upon my recent (mandatory due to University) trips back to a PC running Windows I&#8217;ve noticed just how much it works compared to Windows. Windows was very slow and sluggish, took a lot of time to do things, didn&#8217;t work, sometimes crashed. In my 4 or so years of using Linux (2-3 being solely Linux) it hasn&#8217;t crashed on me one single time. Not once.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">I should explain there are many different varieties of Linux (similar to the different varieties of Windows), each looking or behaving slightly differently, but all based upon similar principles (the Unix operating system). I use Ubuntu, a distribution funded by a rather wealthy man called Mark Shuttleworth. Although he funds it, the OS is still given away for free and makes money by offering support services and business services.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">There are other distributions of Linux such as Red Hat Linux, FreeBSD, openSUSE, Debian, Mint, and many others out there. However Ubuntu is the most popular by far, and this is due to the fact that (and this may sound like a cop-out or contradiction here) it&#8217;s mild similarities to Windows. Don&#8217;t get me wrong it&#8217;s very different to Windows and took a little bit of getting used to but there are some similar features, and compared to some other distributions of Linux, it&#8217;s closer to Windows than they are. Though there is a main difference with the fact that the way Linux has been coded/created it is increasingly difficult (if not perhaps impossible[?]) to get a virus on Linux, and thus Linux users do not need anti-virus software.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">Ubuntu is rather good though. Everything is very easy, and installing is a doddle (now). It used to be rather difficult but now they&#8217;re developed something called a Live Disc, where you can run Ubuntu off of a CD or USB Drive, without affecting your computer at all, to test it out, if you don&#8217;t like it, don&#8217;t install it, if you do, click install and follow the on screen instructions, easy as Windows ever was.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">Back to the bugs I mentioned earlier. To use Linux you really do have to know quite a basic bit about computers, for instance, a bit above the average user, otherwise you&#8217;ll constantly be searching the web/asking friends for help. Some things do go wrong, or don&#8217;t work which you have to fix, small things, but still&#8230;</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">It&#8217;s not quite ready for everyone yet, but if you can use Windows well enough and are sick of it Linux may be a good option for you, however, if you just want a PC that works out of the box (although maybe slow and buggy at times), or are just an average user, stick with PC&#8217;s and Windows.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<h2><span><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-size: small;">Apple OSX</span></span></span></h2>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">Now, this is going to be a short article as I have very little (compared to the other two OS&#8217;s) experience in this OS. What I have used it for (conveniently) is video and sound editing, what they&#8217;re best at.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">My relationship (when I used one and from what I know/have seen/have heard) with a Mac is a rather sour one. First of all you can&#8217;t just consider the OS, you must consider the Mac as well as they come as one, you cannot get Mac OS on another system (legally). Yes they look marvellous, and they have nice effects and the OS is very polished, but you&#8217;re buying a turtle just because he has cool go-faster stripes on his shell.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">OK so that comparison was a bit of an exaggeration, Macs are usually quite decent specification. But still you can get a PC with a much higher specification for a much lower price. You&#8217;re paying for the brand and the style. However I may be swayed by my personal opinion as I would much rather get a free OS (Linux) buy a PC that&#8217;s just a black box with wires in and have that than spend more or a lower specification computer for the branding and style of it.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">Back to the OS; OSX.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">From what I&#8217;ve used of it (remember not much) I didn&#8217;t like it much. A lot of things seemed unnecessary and more difficult than they should be. The Dock at the bottom originally threw me off when I assumed I&#8217;d closed a program only to find it was still running in the Dock, and my only notification was an (extremely) small black triangle below the program icon. Also upon copying files, drag and drop did not copy, it merely moved them which ended with a lot of confusion.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">However they&#8217;ve got rid of the old “There&#8217;s only one mouse button so it sucks” problem with the Mighty Mouse. And, in all honesty, they do look rather good. However you pay for the style as I said earlier. And I&#8217;m more of a power over looks kind of person. My car/PC may look bad but I&#8217;ll leave you in the dust.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">The movie/music editing on the Mac though (which is it&#8217;s main selling point) was quite good. Though this leaves me to wonder, is this due to the software? And if so, a PC with the same software would surely do just as well? But then again the software is developed by Apple so I suppose it is down to them.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">Upon editing a movie I had made, using the Mac to edit was easy. Connecting the camera, transfering the video, syncing the music, all quite simple, so it does do very well there.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">Viruses. One of Macs main selling points is the fact that you can&#8217;t get viruses on it. Well that&#8217;s a straight up lie there. You can. Quite a few actually. And they&#8217;re growing every day. More and more are found. As I said earlier, the popular ones get targeted. Because more and more people are using Macs, more and more people see an open market to create viruses for them; and so more and more viruses are created. Though yes, admittedly, Macs are much less likely to get a virus than a Windows PC as it&#8217;s more difficult for them to get one, but still, they exist.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<h2><span><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-size: small;">Conclusion</span></span></span></h2>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">There isn&#8217;t really one conclusive result. It&#8217;s up to you.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">If you do video or music editing, take pictures or generally deal with designing/artistic careers and have spare cash, then a Mac is for you. I mean it&#8217;d be quite good for general use as well, just the expense of it and the fact that PC&#8217;s are made for the most basic of users to use.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">If you&#8217;re a bit into computers and technology and sick of Windows, want to try something different, or just want something free Linux is a good choice. It&#8217;s developed for free by communities on-line and it&#8217;s nearly at the stage for mass market. Some companies think it is, with many releasing Netbooks with versions of Linux on that are extremely similar to Windows (such as Linpus Linux Lite) to bridge the gap between Linux and Windows, and Dell are selling increasing amounts of PC&#8217;s with Ubuntu installed on them (also to reduce the costs of the PC&#8217;s due to Microsoft Windows Licensing fees). However in my opinion, give it a year or so and it&#8217;ll be nicely fine tuned. I mean, it&#8217;s come a long way in recent years&#8230;</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">And finally Windows. Basically this is for everyone. Everyone can use it, knows it, has used it if they&#8217;ve used a PC. It&#8217;s the most simple and basic of the three and it&#8217;s worldwide (Anyone smell a monopoly?). If you&#8217;re a general user, just want a PC that works out the box or can&#8217;t be bothered with sorting out changing your computer for a Mac or changing to Linux this is probably for you. I know for most of the people I know that use PC&#8217;s on a regular basis, changing wouldn&#8217;t really affect them too much so why bother? Also the fact that they couldn&#8217;t be bothered to learn to use a new system, why would they need to if Windows works for them? The general user of a PC just wants it to work, they don&#8217;t really care too much how it does it, just as long as it does. Windows generally &#8216;just works&#8217; (most of the time) and so people are happy with it.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">Though Macs are on the increase in popularity with Windows users getting tired of crashes and malfunctions and switching to Mac OS; and Linux is slowly and surely getting a small fan-base in the computing community, looking more and more ready for the mass market every update&#8230;</span></span></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2009/07/10/battle-of-the-oss-linux-steps-up-to-the-plate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ASUS Eee box</title>
		<link>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2008/11/23/asus-eee-box/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2008/11/23/asus-eee-box/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 17:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Simmons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitcolumns.com/?p=1062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By now most of the readers of bitolumns may know of ASUS, a very established, inventive technology company. You may know of their very famous, and also very good, netbook the Eee PC, of which a review can be found <a href="http://bitcolumns.com/2008/08/asus-eee-pc-901/">here</a>. Once again ASUS are firing another product at us. This time: A desktop PC. But not just any desktop PC, the ASUS Eee Box, a small, lightweight, low-power-consumption PC. The Eee Box is released on the 25th November of this year (2008). It will be available in black or white.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By now most of the readers of bitolumns may know of ASUS, a very established, inventive technology company. You may know of their very famous, and also very good, netbook the Eee PC, of which a review can be found <a href="http://bitcolumns.com/2008/08/asus-eee-pc-901/">here</a>. Once again ASUS are firing another product at us. This time: A desktop PC. But not just any desktop PC, the ASUS Eee Box, a small, lightweight, low-power-consumption PC. The Eee Box is released on the 25th November of this year (2008). It will be available in black or white.<span id="more-1062"></span></p>
<p>The Eee Box specifications:</p>
<p>1.6 GHZ Intel Atom Processor N270<br />
Windows XP Home Operating System<br />
Intel Chipset Motherboard<br />
WLAN WiFi 802.11b/g/n and 10/100/1000 Mbps Ethernet<br />
1GB DDR2 RAM<br />
WLAN: 802.11 b/g/n<br />
80GB or 160GB HDD (Hard Drive)<br />
SD/SDHC/MS/MS Pro Storage Slots<br />
DVI-Out/USB×4 (2 in front, 2 in rear) (Input/Output)<br />
223×178×26 mm (Dimensions without stand)<br />
Comes complete with ASUS wired mouse and keyboard<br />
<strong>N.B.</strong> This system does not come with an optical drive (CD or DVD reader/writer) and an external one must be bought separately if needed.</p>
<p>The Eee Box will retail at around £200. BitColumns best price offer has so far been found at http://www.ebuyer.com/product/148886 for the Black Eee Box, and http://www.ebuyer.com/product/149899 for the White Eee Box.</p>
<p>The Eee Box is an innovative little desktop system. It&#8217;s mostly been created for the light PC user, someone who won&#8217;t intensively use their desktop system or doesn&#8217;t need to do anything intensive with their desktop. It itself is very small, about the size of 2 DVD cases stacked next to each other. This for a desktop PC is astonishing. It is also whisper quiet in operation. You would struggle to hear it even while using it to its maximum potential, despite this fact it doesn&#8217;t get very warm either.</p>
<p>The looks: It&#8217;s visually very appealing. Our particular test model was the black version which looked very nice and would fit well into any room in the house while looking stylish. The stand that attaches to the bottom of the Eee Box also has a designer look to it, and perhaps even makes the Eee Box look a little bit like a piece of art, but that&#8217;s a matter of opinion. Other than this the Eee Box is very minimalistic in looks. It&#8217;s just the box, a stylish stand and the WLAN aerial at the back. On the front is the on button, illuminated blue, and a front panel. This panel folds out to reveal the on button, the reset button, the HDD activity light, 2 USB ports and the card reader. The card reader takes a range of formats including SD/SDHC/MS/MS Pro so can be useful for permanent or temporary storage. And another last nifty little feature is that if you don&#8217;t want the Eee Box to be seen (and I don&#8217;t know why you wouldn&#8217;t, it looks quite cool) is that it comes complete with an attachment so that it can be attached to the back of a TV or monitor thus turning your TV or monitor into an all-in-one PC. And with the Eee Box being so small and light it becomes essentially invisible and can easily be taken with the TV wherever it goes.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s inside: Inside the processor is the same as the processor from the Eee PC 901, saying that it is a very good processor, it handles running programs, games, and the OS very well. The 1GB of RAM is also plenty of memory to keep the system running smoothly and efficiently. The Hard Drive at 80GB or 160GB is plenty of room for a home PC, for a light user. In any case the 160 GB hard drive is sufficient enough for any user. In any case 16GB SD cards are becoming very cheap nowadays and to buy and insert one into your machine as extra permanent data wouldn&#8217;t be very expensive. The wireless aerial isn&#8217;t too noticeable and is very good. It provides very good wireless connection, found in our testing, and finds connections, connects to them and stays connected very well. Some of the best wireless connections I&#8217;ve seen in a while. 4 USB ports is sufficient enough, 1 for a keyboard, 1 for a mouse and 2 others left for other USB devices, such as a printer or a USB flash drive etc. By now everyone should know what Windows XP is like, and it runs very nicely on this machine, having no problems at all. Having said that though any distribution of Linux would have run very much better and would&#8217;ve used the resources much more efficiently, which is why I favour the Eee PC with the Linux on. Also if it had Linux on instead the price would probably be less as ASUS would not have to pay for the Software License for Microsoft&#8217;s Windows XP (compare the prices of the Eee PC with Windows XP to those with Linux on). Having said that&#8230;</p>
<p>The Express Gate: The Eee Box features a feature called the Express Gate. This is where the Eee Box boots in 7 seconds (that&#8217;s right 7 seconds!) to a splash screen where the user can then access a few basic features very quickly, such as web browser, instant messenger client and some others. This will then load the user into a VERY basic Linux operating system which has the basic features such as web browser, messaging client, system options etc. available, if the suer just wants to use these basic features. However if the suer wants a word processor or any other features they must then go to boot to OS in the options menu. This Linux operating system is very basic keep in mind. Very basic options are available. It is quite easy to use, because it is so basic, however we did have problems with the wireless configuration to begin with, though these were eventually solved. It works quite well, but as we said it&#8217;s very simple so very hard to flaw. Windows can then be booted from here without having to restart the PC and can be found under the options menu.</p>
<p>Performance: We ran a few tests on the Eee Box to test the performance of it and we can say it performs quite well. The hardware inside isn&#8217;t top specced hardware, as can be seen from the price, however it is sufficient and works very well for what it is. It runs the word processor included with the OS (OpenOffice) very well and loads it up quite quickly. This goes for all the OpenOffice software. All other applications such as web browsers, file manager and media players all ran very well on the hardware and the system didn&#8217;t struggle with any of it. It even handled running multiple applications quite well for the hardware it was using. We then tested out a well know MMORPG (Massively Multiplayer Online Role Playing Game) called Guild Wars. We installed this on the system and ran it with minimum graphics. The game worked perfectly. SO we decided to up-step the graphics, it ran fine. Eventually we ran the game at top graphical mode, with the shadows and shaders turned down as they take up a lot of system resources and the game was working very well at high graphics mode (with the shadows and shaders turned down) with minimal (if any) lag. So the graphics and performance of this system are very adequate for playing mid-level PC games. We at bitcolumns were very impressed by these results.</p>
<p>So in conclusion we thought the Eee Box is a bargain! A very good catch for the money you pay for it. Only £200 for a very small, stylish, whisper-quiet and all-rounder PC that can be used for any day to day task and, as we found out from our tests, can play some mid-range games very competently. This would be recommended to: those of you who don&#8217;t use a desktop very much, for example you use a laptop mostly, and just need one as a base unit, to those of you who are very casual PC users and so don&#8217;t want to dish our £500+ for a PC, this is perfect and to parents for a child&#8217;s first computer, or for a teenagers computer as they are cheap, good build, small and have a decent specification. Overall another satisfying product from ASUS, cheap, stylish and small but best of all simplistic!</p>
<p><strong>Score: </strong>4.5/5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2008/11/23/asus-eee-box/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
