<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>bitcolumns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bitcolumns.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bitcolumns.com</link>
	<description>tech news that matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 12:28:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>We&#8217;re Back!!!</title>
		<link>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2010/11/13/were-back/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2010/11/13/were-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 20:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Hutchings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bitcolumns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitcolumns.com/?p=1677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You read it right. We're BACK!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After nearly 18 months of painful inactivity, we have decided to get  bitcolumns back online. Yes that&#8217;s right, the phoenix has risen.</p>
<p>We have a range of new content on the way, from a brand new team (apart from Me. Sam.) who are more passionate and involved in technology and gaming than ever. And what a time to come back, with less than 6 weeks till christmas, and massive products such as Windows Phone 7, Kinect, PlayStation Move, 3DS, etc; hitting the headlines, and giving us tonnes (literally) to talk about.</p>
<p>We hope you&#8217;re happy to see us back, and we&#8217;re gonna try and stay here a bit longer this time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2010/11/13/were-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bioshock 2</title>
		<link>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2010/03/02/bioshock-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2010/03/02/bioshock-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 16:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Hutchings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitcolumns.com/?p=1652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bioshock 2. If you haven't played the original then go and get it. (Images coming soon)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bioshock 2. If you haven&#8217;t played the original then go and get it. Now. This review isn&#8217;t going anywhere. In fact, you should play the original before getting the sequel.</p>
<p>The original cover featured a diving-suited giant, the Big Daddy, one of the toughest opponents to face. So too does two, only this time the cover character is you. Subject Delta, an alpha series big Daddy. Overuse of the Greek alphabet aside, you are one of the first successful models and were assigned to protect a Little Sister. A genetically-modified little girl who sings about angels while harvesting genetic materiel from corpses. Waking up after years of inactivity, you begin hunting for your lost Little Sister.</p>
<p>There are several new features from the original. Subject Delta&#8217;s enormous strength and size enable him to wield the rivet gun, drill-arm and many other heavy weapons that in the previous game you were on the receiving end of. Each one has a very different feel, and unlike many other shooters, each continues to be useful right until the end. The biggest improvement however is the research camera, which has been upgraded from a snapshot to a film reel, and gained unlimited &#8216;ammo&#8217;. Rather than trying to line up a shot of an enemy for maximum points, you simply start the film running and try to get in as many different attacks as you can before it dies.</p>
<p>You also have access to new plasmids, genetic tonics granting the ability to throw fire and lightning, or more unusual things like bees or mind-control tomatoes. All the originals are present, with a handful of new ones and a much better upgrade system. Previously, an upgraded power would deal more damage but now an upgrade lets you charge the power for new effects. Upgrade the Incinerate! Power, and your fires become explosions or flamethrowers, lightning bolts chain between targets, frozen enemies shatter into deadly shards and many more deadly effects await. Another nice touch is that each upgrade requires the previous level, so you don&#8217;t feel punished for upgrading early.</p>
<p>We also see some new enemies, along with the original cast of splicers. Special attention should be drawn to the Big Sisters, a new model of protector for the Little Sisters, they actively hunt you and other than a few scripted sections could show up almost any time. A shriek in the distance warns you when one is after you, giving you a short time to prepare before the fight starts. As she leaps around you, firing the same plasmid-powered attacks you have access to, you feel much more like a Big Daddy lumbering in it&#8217;s diving suit than at any other time.</p>
<p>The diving suit itself is a point of interest. Trailers promised us the ability to leave the underwater city of Rapture and explore outside, the sea-bed. This does indeed happen, but it is something of a disappointment. Delta puts away his guns and fistful of lightning, the diving helmet becomes more pronounced, restricting your vision, and water rises in an airlock. Then the door opens, and you step out into the ocean. You wander through a threatless valley of coral to another airlock, and reverse the process. Sometimes a small cliff prevents you from turning back, and later on you can loot drowned opponents or sunken crates for supplies, but the sections feel pointless.</p>
<p>Exploring the indoor areas feels much the same. Any game with a story to tell has a linear plot, but Bioshock 2 doesn&#8217;t even try to hide it. You take a train from one location to the next, solving the problem preventing you from driving further. Railroad plot has never been more literal, and for all that Delta&#8217;s allies call him a freed slave, you never seem to have an agenda of our own. You feel less in control than in the previous game, which is something of an irony. To say more would spoil it though.</p>
<p>Overall, this is a great sequel. It has it&#8217;s flaws, but they are minor in comparison. The combat is challenging, the story captivating and the atmosphere just as perfect as before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2010/03/02/bioshock-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone 3.1 Released Today</title>
		<link>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2009/09/09/iphone-31-released-today/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2009/09/09/iphone-31-released-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 20:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Hutchings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitcolumns.com/?p=1632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More features, and software fixes, for free? Yes please!!! Apple treats us to iPhone OS 3.1]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At today&#8217;s &#8220;It&#8217;s Only Rock and Roll&#8221; media event, Apple announced the availability of iPhone OS 3.1 for the iPhone and iPod touch. The new firmware will be able to take advantage of the new Genius feature for apps to help users find new apps that may be of interest based on past purchases, organise Apps in iTunes, and will also allow wireless downloading of new pre-cut ringtones. The <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/softwareupdate/" target="_blank">full list of 3.1 features and updates</a> includes the following:</p>
<div></div>
<ul>
<li>Improved syncing for music, movies, TV shows, podcasts, and photos</li>
<li>Redeem iTunes Gift Cards, codes, and certificates in the App Store</li>
<li>Display available iTunes account credits in the App Store and iTunes Store</li>
<li>Save video from Mail and MMS into Camera Roll</li>
<li>Option to &#8220;Save as new clip&#8221; when trimming a video on iPhone 3GS</li>
<li>Better iPhone 3G Wi-Fi performance when Bluetooth is turned on</li>
<li>Remotely lock iPhone with a passcode using MobileMe</li>
<li>Use iPhone 3GS Voice Control with Bluetooth headsets</li>
<li>Paste phone numbers into the keypad</li>
<li>Anti-phishing features in Safari</li>
<li>Fixes issues that caused some app icons to display incorrectly</li>
</ul>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 175px"><img title="Ringtones in iTunes on iPhone" src="webkit-fake-url://1FB0C99B-9E88-45B8-AE92-92DC8B2A325C/download-ringtones-20090909.jpg" alt="download-ringtones-20090909.jpg" width="165" height="343" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Buy ringtones directly from iTunes, on your iPhone</p></div>
<p>iPhone OS 3.1 is available now and is a free download for iPhone customers and iPod touch users already running iPhone OS 3.0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2009/09/09/iphone-31-released-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spotify launches on iPhone, iPod Touch, and Android</title>
		<link>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2009/09/07/spotify-launches-on-iphone-ipod-touch-and-android/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2009/09/07/spotify-launches-on-iphone-ipod-touch-and-android/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 14:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Hutchings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spotify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stream]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitcolumns.com/?p=1628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today saw Spotify expand into the mobile market with their application for iPhone, iPod Touch, and Android. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today saw Spotify expand into the mobile market with their application for iPhone, iPod Touch, and Android. The application allows Spotify Premium subscribers to stream music straight to their phones over 3G and Wi-Fi, as well as save their playlists to the phone for later listening.</p>
<p>Expect a review from us in the very near future, where we will cover all the new features as well as the competitors to Spotify.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2009/09/07/spotify-launches-on-iphone-ipod-touch-and-android/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>bitcolumns is changing, yet again.</title>
		<link>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2009/08/31/bitcolumns-is-changing-yet-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2009/08/31/bitcolumns-is-changing-yet-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Hutchings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitcolumns.com/?p=1626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since its inception in May 2008 bitcolumns has changed. We have changed names, designs, members of the team, ideas, features, etc. But we have always had the same focus: bringing the latest technology news and reviews to a student audience. Some of you may think, well there is no reason to change that. But we [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since its inception in May 2008 bitcolumns has changed. We have changed names, designs, members of the team, ideas, features, etc. But we have always had the same focus: bringing the latest technology news and reviews to a student audience.</p>
<p>Some of you may think, well there is no reason to change that. But we think differently, and it is with this post that I publicise the change that will be happening at bitcolumns over the coming months.</p>
<p>We are changing our focus completely, moving from a student based general technology site, to a more general audience site that focuses on Mobile and Gaming technology as our main areas. And you will see this change reflected in our new content over the next few weeks.</p>
<p>We also have a complete team change. Almost all of the old team are gone, and new people are now on board. You will meet them in their upcoming posts on the site, as well as learn a bit about them as time goes by.</p>
<p>So what else?</p>
<p>Well, the bitcast is suspended until further notice, we may have a new site design and code base coming out in the next few months, as well as other changes that are still in the idea phase of their life.</p>
<p>I am working hard to make bitcolumns a success, and a good resource for those who read it. And this passion will be reflected as soon as time allows. Keep tuned to see what happens.</p>
<p>Sam Hutchings</p>
<p>Head Editor, Owner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2009/08/31/bitcolumns-is-changing-yet-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Battle of the OS&#8217;s: Linux Steps up to the Plate</title>
		<link>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2009/07/10/battle-of-the-oss-linux-steps-up-to-the-plate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2009/07/10/battle-of-the-oss-linux-steps-up-to-the-plate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Simmons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitcolumns.com/?p=1610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Introduction to Linux You may or may not know what Linux is. It is an Operating System, the software you use to communicate with the different parts of your computer. Another, very well known OS (Operating System) is Windows, which has many different versions (Windows: XP, Vista and the soon-to-be-released Windows 7). Linux, however, is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div class="Section1">
<h2><span style="font-size: small; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: underline;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Introduction to Linux</span></span></h2>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">You may or may not know what Linux is. It is an Operating System, the software you use to communicate with the different parts of your computer. Another, very well known OS (Operating System) is Windows, which has many different versions (Windows: XP, Vista and the soon-to-be-released Windows 7).</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">Linux, however, is not a commercial product, in the essence that it is not for sale, it is free. It is developed by on-line communities and, in some cases, software developers.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">Windows is produced by Microsoft, by professional software developers, and is available to the user for a fee.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">Linux is Open-Source software, meaning anyone can get the source code (the code that makes up any program) and change it and compile (create) it as they will. Thus it is all free to anyone who desires it, enabling massive flexibility, but also opening it up for compatibility problems as well.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">Microsoft, however, have copyrighted their code for Windows and thus do not release it to the public. Fair enough though, they created it, why should they give it away for free? Also, being a commercial company, this minimises the chance of incompatibility (something Apple have got down to a tee).</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">Apple have a similar principle, as they are also a commercial company, however Apple OSX has been considered a pure version of Unix (an OS Linux was based on). They also do not release their code and make it more difficult for third parties to develop software so as to minimalise (if not entirely route out) the problem of incompatibility, which is the reason why Macs are growing in popularity.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<h2><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="text-decoration: none;">Why Linux? Why Windows? Why Mac OS?</span></span></span></h2>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">The age old question: Which OS do you use? As important to some people as football teams and has created many-a-internet flame war.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">The Apple fan boys, who love Apple and anything said against it gets shot down immediately.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">The Linux fan boys who behave in a similar way, except are usually more knowledgeable with computers and thus think they&#8217;re superior to others.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">And then the people that just use Windows, because it&#8217;s there. Very few fan boys generally exist for Windows.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<h2><span><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-size: small;">Windows</span></span></span></h2>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">You always hear bad press about Windows: Doesn&#8217;t work, viruses, blah blah&#8230;</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">It does work. I&#8217;ll say that straight up. And this is difficult for me to say (*Has been using Linux for 2-3 years and hasn&#8217;t ever looked back*). It just has problems now and then. As I mentioned, people can develop software for it, anyone. You, your brother, sister, father, mother, anyone. So Microsoft have no handle over this. And it&#8217;s up to the user to decide: Is this a good thing to install? If you&#8217;ve paid for it; usually yes, as the company is probably professional; if it&#8217;s free, no, it could&#8217;ve been designed by anyone for any purpose and thus may mess with your computer.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">Microsoft can do nothing about this as it&#8217;s not their stuff that&#8217;s messing up, it&#8217;s someone else&#8217;s.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">Another element: Viruses. You always hear statistics about viruses: Windows has over X amounts of viruses, a new virus out. Windows only gets more viruses because it is more popular. A lot fewer people use Linux or Mac OS than Windows so why bother targeting them? Target the mass market. Though with the growing popularity of the other OS&#8217;s it&#8217;s bringing increasing amounts of new viruses for those OS&#8217;s&#8230;</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">Yes Windows is a bit buggy sometimes but you can&#8217;t entirely blame it alone, it&#8217;s down to a number of factors.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">Why I don&#8217;t use it will come apart when I talk about&#8230;</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<h2><span><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-size: small;">Linux</span></span></span></h2>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">I love Linux. There it is. It&#8217;s great. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I&#8217;m not a fan boy, it&#8217;s buggy as a lone light, mid-summer, coated with moths, but it&#8217;s great. It works. Simple as that. Well, after a little bit of work, and some tweaking. But it works.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">Upon my recent (mandatory due to University) trips back to a PC running Windows I&#8217;ve noticed just how much it works compared to Windows. Windows was very slow and sluggish, took a lot of time to do things, didn&#8217;t work, sometimes crashed. In my 4 or so years of using Linux (2-3 being solely Linux) it hasn&#8217;t crashed on me one single time. Not once.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">I should explain there are many different varieties of Linux (similar to the different varieties of Windows), each looking or behaving slightly differently, but all based upon similar principles (the Unix operating system). I use Ubuntu, a distribution funded by a rather wealthy man called Mark Shuttleworth. Although he funds it, the OS is still given away for free and makes money by offering support services and business services.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">There are other distributions of Linux such as Red Hat Linux, FreeBSD, openSUSE, Debian, Mint, and many others out there. However Ubuntu is the most popular by far, and this is due to the fact that (and this may sound like a cop-out or contradiction here) it&#8217;s mild similarities to Windows. Don&#8217;t get me wrong it&#8217;s very different to Windows and took a little bit of getting used to but there are some similar features, and compared to some other distributions of Linux, it&#8217;s closer to Windows than they are. Though there is a main difference with the fact that the way Linux has been coded/created it is increasingly difficult (if not perhaps impossible[?]) to get a virus on Linux, and thus Linux users do not need anti-virus software.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">Ubuntu is rather good though. Everything is very easy, and installing is a doddle (now). It used to be rather difficult but now they&#8217;re developed something called a Live Disc, where you can run Ubuntu off of a CD or USB Drive, without affecting your computer at all, to test it out, if you don&#8217;t like it, don&#8217;t install it, if you do, click install and follow the on screen instructions, easy as Windows ever was.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">Back to the bugs I mentioned earlier. To use Linux you really do have to know quite a basic bit about computers, for instance, a bit above the average user, otherwise you&#8217;ll constantly be searching the web/asking friends for help. Some things do go wrong, or don&#8217;t work which you have to fix, small things, but still&#8230;</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">It&#8217;s not quite ready for everyone yet, but if you can use Windows well enough and are sick of it Linux may be a good option for you, however, if you just want a PC that works out of the box (although maybe slow and buggy at times), or are just an average user, stick with PC&#8217;s and Windows.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<h2><span><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-size: small;">Apple OSX</span></span></span></h2>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">Now, this is going to be a short article as I have very little (compared to the other two OS&#8217;s) experience in this OS. What I have used it for (conveniently) is video and sound editing, what they&#8217;re best at.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">My relationship (when I used one and from what I know/have seen/have heard) with a Mac is a rather sour one. First of all you can&#8217;t just consider the OS, you must consider the Mac as well as they come as one, you cannot get Mac OS on another system (legally). Yes they look marvellous, and they have nice effects and the OS is very polished, but you&#8217;re buying a turtle just because he has cool go-faster stripes on his shell.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">OK so that comparison was a bit of an exaggeration, Macs are usually quite decent specification. But still you can get a PC with a much higher specification for a much lower price. You&#8217;re paying for the brand and the style. However I may be swayed by my personal opinion as I would much rather get a free OS (Linux) buy a PC that&#8217;s just a black box with wires in and have that than spend more or a lower specification computer for the branding and style of it.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">Back to the OS; OSX.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">From what I&#8217;ve used of it (remember not much) I didn&#8217;t like it much. A lot of things seemed unnecessary and more difficult than they should be. The Dock at the bottom originally threw me off when I assumed I&#8217;d closed a program only to find it was still running in the Dock, and my only notification was an (extremely) small black triangle below the program icon. Also upon copying files, drag and drop did not copy, it merely moved them which ended with a lot of confusion.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">However they&#8217;ve got rid of the old “There&#8217;s only one mouse button so it sucks” problem with the Mighty Mouse. And, in all honesty, they do look rather good. However you pay for the style as I said earlier. And I&#8217;m more of a power over looks kind of person. My car/PC may look bad but I&#8217;ll leave you in the dust.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">The movie/music editing on the Mac though (which is it&#8217;s main selling point) was quite good. Though this leaves me to wonder, is this due to the software? And if so, a PC with the same software would surely do just as well? But then again the software is developed by Apple so I suppose it is down to them.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">Upon editing a movie I had made, using the Mac to edit was easy. Connecting the camera, transfering the video, syncing the music, all quite simple, so it does do very well there.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">Viruses. One of Macs main selling points is the fact that you can&#8217;t get viruses on it. Well that&#8217;s a straight up lie there. You can. Quite a few actually. And they&#8217;re growing every day. More and more are found. As I said earlier, the popular ones get targeted. Because more and more people are using Macs, more and more people see an open market to create viruses for them; and so more and more viruses are created. Though yes, admittedly, Macs are much less likely to get a virus than a Windows PC as it&#8217;s more difficult for them to get one, but still, they exist.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<h2><span><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-size: small;">Conclusion</span></span></span></h2>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">There isn&#8217;t really one conclusive result. It&#8217;s up to you.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">If you do video or music editing, take pictures or generally deal with designing/artistic careers and have spare cash, then a Mac is for you. I mean it&#8217;d be quite good for general use as well, just the expense of it and the fact that PC&#8217;s are made for the most basic of users to use.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">If you&#8217;re a bit into computers and technology and sick of Windows, want to try something different, or just want something free Linux is a good choice. It&#8217;s developed for free by communities on-line and it&#8217;s nearly at the stage for mass market. Some companies think it is, with many releasing Netbooks with versions of Linux on that are extremely similar to Windows (such as Linpus Linux Lite) to bridge the gap between Linux and Windows, and Dell are selling increasing amounts of PC&#8217;s with Ubuntu installed on them (also to reduce the costs of the PC&#8217;s due to Microsoft Windows Licensing fees). However in my opinion, give it a year or so and it&#8217;ll be nicely fine tuned. I mean, it&#8217;s come a long way in recent years&#8230;</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">And finally Windows. Basically this is for everyone. Everyone can use it, knows it, has used it if they&#8217;ve used a PC. It&#8217;s the most simple and basic of the three and it&#8217;s worldwide (Anyone smell a monopoly?). If you&#8217;re a general user, just want a PC that works out the box or can&#8217;t be bothered with sorting out changing your computer for a Mac or changing to Linux this is probably for you. I know for most of the people I know that use PC&#8217;s on a regular basis, changing wouldn&#8217;t really affect them too much so why bother? Also the fact that they couldn&#8217;t be bothered to learn to use a new system, why would they need to if Windows works for them? The general user of a PC just wants it to work, they don&#8217;t really care too much how it does it, just as long as it does. Windows generally &#8216;just works&#8217; (most of the time) and so people are happy with it.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: small;">Though Macs are on the increase in popularity with Windows users getting tired of crashes and malfunctions and switching to Mac OS; and Linux is slowly and surely getting a small fan-base in the computing community, looking more and more ready for the mass market every update&#8230;</span></span></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2009/07/10/battle-of-the-oss-linux-steps-up-to-the-plate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why All The Commotion?: Apple iPhone</title>
		<link>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2009/06/30/why-all-the-commotion-apple-iphone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2009/06/30/why-all-the-commotion-apple-iphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Hutchings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitcolumns.com/?p=1596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why is the iPhone talked about so much?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In terms of features the iPhone is nothing new. It has a camera, A-GPS, 3G, Wi-Fi, Stereo (A2DP) Bluetooth, MMS, Web Browser, Clock, Voice Recorder, Calculator, Phonebook, Calendar, and last but not least, a Phone.</p>
<p>I will be one of the first to admit that in terms of raw hardware and out of the box features the iPhone is lacking. That camera could be 5 or 8 Megapixel, it could have a memory expansion slot, it could have a QWERTY keyboard, etc, etc. But it doesn&#8217;t&#8230;.</p>
<p><strong>So why all the commotion?</strong></p>
<p>At least once a day one of us will see an advert or article about the iPhone (this article included), or hear someone talking about how awesome it is. And on the other side of that you will also see an anti-iphone advert or article, and someone arguing how it is worse than their Blackberry, or Nokia Smart phone, or similar. The reasons for both of these are quite clear: Business, and personal opinion. But the problem comes in that with the iPhone, the traditional way of comparing phones and gadgets has gone out of the window.</p>
<p>The beauty of the iPhone is not in the hardware (unless you count the design) but instead, it is in the software that runs the device. No phone software out at the moment (at least here in the UK) has been successful in getting people to use more and more of the features on their phones than ever before. The reason for this: Simplicity.</p>
<p><strong>The problem with buttons</strong></p>
<p>The iPhone&#8217;s operating system is very easy to use, and brings something slightly revolutionary to the phone market: the lack of a menu button!!!</p>
<p>Sound&#8217;s silly doesn&#8217;t it, but it is not. Every other phone I have ever owned (even other touch screen phones) had still had a menu button putting an extra button press between you and your features. The iPhone removes this completely. Whereas on some phone I may need to go to Menu &gt; Programs &gt; Web Browser, on the iPhone it is merely the tap of of a finger on the Safari icon (which I can place on the dock to make it available on any home screen). Too lazy to search through the screens, use Spotlight to search for it&#8230; The number of clicks has been reduced from 3 or more, to 1. Saving over a 3rd of the time in launching an application.</p>
<p><strong>The App Store</strong></p>
<p>One of the major loves people have of the iPhone is the applications, and there are loads. In fact, there are over 50,000 Apps in the App store, many of which are free.</p>
<p>Their charm is in the fact that you can do pretty much anything if you find the right App, hence Apple&#8217;s &#8220;There&#8217;s an App for that&#8221; campaign. Mix this with the ease of installation and purchasing that comes from Apple&#8217;s experience with iTunes and it becomes a dead cert. But there are still major problems:</p>
<p>The approval system. Apple has a very enigmatic approval system, in fact I doubt they even know how it works. Whilst one app may be approved, one very similar app may be rejected. Apps that people think should be approved, sometimes aren&#8217;t, etc.</p>
<p><strong>In Conclusion</strong></p>
<p>Mix these two ingredients with an iPod, Dictaphone, GPS, Calculator, YouTube device, Calendar, Notebook, Email, Calendar, etc; and keep the simplicity in all these parts and you have a phone that many people are able to, and enjoy to, use.Yes it is not the best hardware in the world, and it is not the best value for money on the hardware front. But that is not the point.</p>
<p>The beauty of this device is in it&#8217;s ease of use, it&#8217;s looks, and the systems that support it. And until other phone manufacturers are able to get this mix right they will still see an increasing number of sales going to the iPhone range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2009/06/30/why-all-the-commotion-apple-iphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>bitcolumns, now on your phone</title>
		<link>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2009/06/12/bitcolumns-now-on-your-phone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2009/06/12/bitcolumns-now-on-your-phone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Hutchings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bitcolumns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mofuse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitcolumns.com/?p=1593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[View bitcolumns.com quickly, and easily on your mobile phone.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bitcolumns site is quite image laden, meaning it is not always the best site to access on your phone. It can also sometimes take a while to load. It is for this reason we have now got a mobile version of bitcolumns.com (thanks to our friends over at www.mofuse.com.)</p>
<p>Now, if you access http://mobile.bitcolumns.com on a mobile phone (apart from an iPhone, which will access our normal site) you will be sent to our new text-based mobile phone site. Although not quite so pretty, it will bring you all the same information in a faster loading format.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2009/06/12/bitcolumns-now-on-your-phone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking News: iPhone 3GS</title>
		<link>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2009/06/08/breaking-news-iphone-3gs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2009/06/08/breaking-news-iphone-3gs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 21:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Hutchings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitcolumns.com/?p=1589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The WWDC Keynote has come to and end, let's talk iPhone]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today Apple Inc. announced the third and latest iPhone in the family, the iPhone 3GS (the S meaning Speed). This latest iPhone is described as the fastest, and most eco-friendly yet, with a whole bunch of new features (as well as launching with iPhone OS 3.0 installed) when it launches on June 19th. Let&#8217;s take a look at the new features, firstly of the 3GS and then of iPhone OS 3.0.</p>
<p>The iPhone 3GS sees no cosmetic change from the iPhone 3G, but does bring some cool new features to the party:</p>
<ul>
<li>An upgraded 3 megapixel, auto-focus, video recording camera to replace the current 2 megapixel camera</li>
<li>A digital compass, with its own app. You can instantly see which direction you are facing, orient Google Maps to the way you are facing; or jsut get bored, spin around, and see if you can stop at 0.</li>
<li>Basic video editing features (select start and end of clip), which you cna then use to upload directly toYouTube.</li>
<li>Voice Control: Phone a contact, select a song, or find out what song is playing just using your voice. Hold the Home button to talk to the iPhone, and the iPhone talks back.</li>
</ul>
<div id="attachment_1590" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 610px"><a href="http://www.bitcolumns.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/iphone3gs_3up.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-1590" title="iphone3gs_3up" src="http://www.bitcolumns.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/iphone3gs_3up.jpg" alt="The iPhone 3G's faster, more flashy, identical younger cousin" width="600" height="400" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The iPhone 3G&#39;s faster, more flashy, identical younger cousin</p></div>
<p>All of these features should run very smoothly, with the 3GS performing up to twice as fast as its 3G cousin. And the best bit? All of this, with improved battery power (All values aproximate, and sourced from www.apple.com):</p>
<ul>
<li>Talk time:
<ul>
<li>Up to 12 hours on 2G</li>
<li>Up to 5 hours on 3G</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Standby time: Up to 300 hours</li>
<li>Internet Use
<ul>
<li>Up to 5 hours on 3G</li>
<li>Up to 9 hours on Wi-Fi</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Video playback: Up to 10 hours</li>
<li>Audio playback: Up to 30 hours</li>
</ul>
<h2>iPhone 3G</h2>
<p>So what about us iPhone 3G owners? On June 17th we can upgrade to iPhone OS 3.0, for free. Yup, completely free! But what does this get us?</p>
<ul>
<li>Cut, Copy and Paste
<ul>
<li>in all applications and websites</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Landscape Keyboard
<ul>
<li>now available in Mail, Messages, Notes and Safari</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>MMS
<ul>
<li>Send MMS messages and include photos, audio, and contact info. You can take a photo from inside the new Messages App</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Spotlight Search
<ul>
<li>Flick the Home screen to the right to find a new Spotlight screen, where you can search all of your contacts, calendars, and notes, as well as everythig in your iPod.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Voice Memos
<ul>
<li>If you have an important lecture or meeting you can now use your iPhone to record the audio, out of the box. Only time will tell if this app can live up to the ones already available in the App Store.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Improved Calendar
<ul>
<li>The calendar now works with Microsoft Exchange, as well as CalDAV (the protocol used by Google Calendar, and others).</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Buy Movies, TV Shows, and Audiobooks
<ul>
<li>You can now buy all of the above in the iTunes app directly on the phone, but downloads over 10MB still require a Wi-Fi connection.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>A faster, better Safari with autofill usernames and passwords</li>
<li>Internet Tethering (requires bolt-on in the UK) so that you can use your iPhone as a modem</li>
<li>Stereo Bluetooth
<ul>
<li>Connect your iPhone to compatible stereo headphones, car kits or other accessories to blast people with music.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Automatic Wi-Fi Login
<ul>
<li>Do you often use wireless hotspots in cafes, etc? The iPhone can now automatically log you in to these hotspots to save you time and typing.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>YouTube Login
<ul>
<li>You can now use your YouTube account on your phone, to save and sync bookmarks as well as rate your favourite movies.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Sync Notes
<ul>
<li>Sync notes between your iPhone and Mac/PC so that you never lose them again</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Shake to Shuffle (but not too hard)
<ul>
<li>You can now shake the iPhone to shuffle to a different song in your iPod list. Just don&#8217;t shake it too hard or it may go the same way as your Wii Remote.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Run the Latest Apps
<ul>
<li>iPhone 3G users will still be able to run the latest apps, including peer-to-peer games (multiplayer to you and me), as well as using accessories through the dock connector and bluetooth.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>For those of you looking to upgrade to the new iPhone, or buy one for the first time, prices can be found at the <a title="iPhone 3GS @ O2" href="http://shop.o2.co.uk/update/newiphone.html">O2 Website</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2009/06/08/breaking-news-iphone-3gs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monday&#8217;s Child has iPhone Fever</title>
		<link>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2009/06/07/mondays-child-has-iphone-fever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2009/06/07/mondays-child-has-iphone-fever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 16:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Hutchings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joggler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schiller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wwdc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitcolumns.com/?p=1584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tomorrow, Monday 8th June, is the subject of almost every Apple based article and conversation happening in the world rigt now. But why? The reason is this, tomorrow sees the beginning of Apple&#8217;s Worldwide Developer Conference, or WWDC (Don&#8217;t ask us where the extra W came from). This conference brings some of the top developers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tomorrow, Monday 8th June, is the subject of almost every Apple based article and conversation happening in the world rigt now. But why?</p>
<p>The reason is this, tomorrow sees the beginning of Apple&#8217;s Worldwide Developer Conference, or WWDC (Don&#8217;t ask us where the extra W came from). This conference brings some of the top developers in the world, as well as those just starting out, into one place for a few days of workshops, seminars, lunches, and I assume parties. But of recent years it has become a very important event for all Apple fans over the world. As the keynote that it opens with, normally pesented by Steve Jobs but opened this year by Phil Schiller, is the couple of hours where we get a first look at the ew Mac OS and&#8230; the brand new iPhone.</p>
<p>Now unless you have been hidden under a rock, inside a faraday cage, in the amazon rainforst; you will have probably heard one or two or 20 rumours about what people are expecting in the new iPhone. Video recording, front facing camera, magnometer (compass), repositioned speaker and headphone socket, camera button, video calling, matte/rubberised back, no more chrome frame, and coffee dispenser (I admit I made that one up myself); are all just a taster of what rumours are flying round the internet at this moment in time. There is even a rumoured name floating around: the iPhone Video.</p>
<p>As an iPhone fan, and owner, I am currently counting the hours, minutes, seconds, and milliseconds until the keynote starts (6pm GMT, Monday 8th June) so I can watch it online and drool over the iPhone if it is announced.</p>
<p>Now some of you are problably thinking &#8220;How can you be sure there will even be a new announcement?&#8221;, well there are a few clues:</p>
<ol>
<li>Apple are very predictable when it comes to when they announce product refreshes, with Phil Schiller himself saying at Macworld in January that the iPhone&#8217;s refresh cycle is June/July each year</li>
<li>O2 has started to withdraw current iPhone 3G avertising here in the UK. Stores are replacing iPhone POS with adverts for the new O2 Joggler, where iPhone adverts have been for almost a year, national newspapers are no longer carrying the iPhone 3G &#8216;There&#8217;s an app for that&#8217; advertising on the backs of some of their supplements, again replaced with the O2 Joggler.</li>
</ol>
<p>This second point is the biggest hint. O2 have actively advertised the iPhone 3G since before it&#8217;s July 11th launch last year. With adverts in stores, newspapers, television, the internet. For them to start to retract some of these means that something must be happening in the world of the iPhone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bitcolumns.com/2009/06/07/mondays-child-has-iphone-fever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

